Built by You.
Enhanced by AI.

I spent seven years building original creator technology. Now I want to build the company around it.

Real Video Creator is deployed. Real Gamers has a working native streaming engine. I am seeking $500,000 to hire the people and build the distribution needed to commercialize both as one creator ecosystem.

Founder-reported figures. Real Gamers and RVC are not yet directly integrated.

I gave the deck more detail because my voice is temporarily gone.

The story is mine. VoiceLab helps me tell it, and these visuals show the work.

I intended to pitch without a script, but laryngitis got in the way. The narration you're hearing is my own cloned voice from VoiceLab, reading words I wrote. I expanded this deck so you can see the actual products and demonstrations while I explain them.

For this pitch I generated and downloaded nearly 20,000 characters of narration with my VoiceLab voice in about 40 minutes. This is my observed workflow, not a certified speed benchmark.

Creators should not need five tools to finish one idea.

I used established tools. The friction was everything between them.

Capture the moment. Transfer files. Find a clip. Edit the footage. Generate narration elsewhere. Make channel graphics. Export again. Each handoff steals time from the actual creative work.

The combined cross-product workflow is planned, not yet released.

I built the production systems beneath the Studio.

RVC is not only a website, and Real Gamers is not only a streaming UI.

My RVC deployment uses dedicated application and media-processing services. My Real Gamers application runs on Windows and uses LUNA for native graphics and streaming.

• RVC applicationDjango, PostgreSQL, Redis, Celery, Daphne/Channels, media assets and project workflows.
• Media and VoiceLabFFmpeg processing, dedicated voice workers, consent-aware private outputs and recovery logic.
• Financial systemsPayPal-backed subscriptions, personalized invitations, quote approval, credit reservations and webhook processing.
• Real Gamers / LUNARust/Tauri, Direct3D 11 graphics, GPU surfaces, encoding, native streaming transport, replay and scene controls.

The 2026 code audits identified implemented architecture and areas requiring further verification. A test definition count is not a passing-test count.

I did not license a streaming engine. I built LUNA.

Real Gamers is powered by my own native graphics and streaming architecture.

I wrote the proprietary engineering behind capture, Direct3D 11 GPU composition, hardware encoding, streaming transport, recording and replay. I've used Real Gamers for streaming to Twitch and YouTube, and I recently captured a simultaneous Kick and YouTube founder demonstration.

Real Gamers is a separate Windows application, prelaunch for broad customer adoption.

I control the engine, not just the interface.

OBS, Streamlabs and CapCut each solve important parts of a creator workflow.

My differentiation is native LUNA engineering plus an editable-first browser Studio, with a planned direct handoff between streaming and finished content. A large competitor can copy a feature, but replacing the underlying engineering and connected experience takes sustained effort.

I have not yet measured a controlled time-saving comparison or an independent customer switch attributable to the planned integration.

I have built the technology. I have not proved traction yet.

These are the numbers I can report today.

I am separating founder testing from genuine customer activity and will publish a dated weekly-active-creator count once verified. I am not calling generation jobs independent customers.

Founder-reported October 26 snapshot; success states and independent-user attribution are not yet fully reconciled.

I will make every completed project an invitation to try RVC.

The first creator is not the only person who can discover the product.

RVC already offers free access and watermark-limited export. That can put the product in front of other creators. I want to pair that exposure with tracked creator invitations and human-led outreach, then prove which paths actually convert.

A watermark is a discovery mechanism, not a demonstrated viral growth loop. Referral and export-to-signup conversion must be measured.

I sell the workspace. I quote variable generation.

Creator subscriptions and expensive generation are separate decisions.

Cash is collected monthly, not upfront. Contribution margin must deduct processing, service costs, failures, refunds and nonpayment.

I need a real team, not another year doing everything myself.

My first engineering hire reduces the key-person risk. Human-led marketing builds distribution.

I want an engineer who can take ownership of deployments, runbooks, incident response and reliability. I also want experienced marketing professionals developing real campaigns and relationships with creators.

These are hiring priorities, not existing employees or contracted advisors.

I raised my target from $250K after budgeting the real plan.

Asking for less would leave the commercialization work underfunded.

I want to fund the right hires, a serious marketing effort, product integration, reliable operations and a financial cushion. My goal is to reach sustainable operations without depending on another raise, although I cannot guarantee that outcome.

Total: $500K. Planning allocations, not approved contracts. $30K of the acquisition allocation may fund 300 creator bonuses.

I will stage spending across the four quarters.

I am restoring the quarterly capital schedule from my earlier deck.

The existing six-category $500,000 budget remains intact. These quarterly figures show the planned timing of that same budget, not extra spending on top of it.

Prior planning schedule: Q1 $100K, Q2 $115K, Q3 $130K, Q4 $155K. These do not constitute committed expenditures.

I will build the operating team and prove the first conversions.

The first six months establish a measured growth process before I increase spending.

All creator and payer numbers are cumulative proposed quarter-end goals, not current performance.

I simplified the investment terms after advice.

My intention is one SAFE with startup counsel handling the documents.

My earlier investor materials discussed a $10 million post-money valuation cap and a 20% conversion discount. Those are indicative negotiation terms only; I will have counsel confirm the structure and the applicable conversion calculation.

Not a securities offer or executed term sheet. An instrument containing both cap and discount requires appropriate drafting and counsel review.

I would rather name the unknowns than pretend they are solved.

My technical work is substantial. Commercial proof is the next milestone.

The open questions include customer retention and willingness to pay, realized unit margins, sustained multi-tenant load, certain worker resource boundaries, and independent security validation. My recent review shows improvements in service hardening, but not closure of every historic finding.

A technical audit establishes what was inspected. It does not automatically establish product-market fit, load capacity or full SOC 2 attestation.

I built the foundation. I am ready to prove the market.

Seeking $500,000 through a single proposed SAFE, with terms reviewed by counsel.

I want to build a company that recognizes smaller creators, keeps the human in control and provides a complete path from an idea to finished content. I am looking for investors who understand the engineering and want to help me prove the business.

Investor overview, October 26, 2026. Figures and forward-looking plans subject to due diligence.